ML Archiv: RE: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???

Olympus-OM

RE: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???

from Giles

Subject:	RE: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???
From:	"Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 26 Nov 1999 10:50:03 +0000

I concur with this also.  Using a 2-4 screen with a 24mm f2 and peering 
through the viewfinder wearing my glasses I have no problem.

Giles

Olaf Greve wrote:

> fine, and even with the 24mm I don't experience difficulty in focusing,
> however, reportedly some people do. The issue with using a 2-13 with slow
> 

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, James G. Boutilier (CEP) Re: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, GMA Re: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Giles Re: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Pauls0627 Re: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Dirk Wright RE: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Dave Bulger Re: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Jim Mueller RE: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Ángel Lobo [OM] 2 series screens (was "OM10 or OM-1N???"), Joel Wilcox RE: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Olaf Greve RE: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Giles <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Seattle Chrome, Gettis John
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] NG Gorilla with OM2, Giles
Previous by Thread:	RE: [OM] OM10 or OM-1N???, Olaf Greve
Next by Thread:	[OM] Re: olympus-digest V2 #1254, Paul Tierney
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]