Skip;
Repeat after me: "Rrreeeee - Laaaxxxxxx" :>)
No, my teaser is not about a lens they didn't produce, it's about a way to
get a (surprisingly well-performing) appx 150/2.8 macro out of stuff they
did make.
You do it by combining th ooops, my power's flickering. Gotta go.
george
>I hope you're kidding. That'd be a cruel joke to a macro guy like me.
>
>I've always envied the 200/4 Micro-Nikkor. And now you're telling me that
>Olympus had something like that and didn't produce it??!
>
><ggrrr>
>
>Skip
>
>At 11/24/99 09:09 AM -0800, you wrote:
>
>>How about a Zuiko 150/2.8 macro? Details to follow.
>>
>>George
>>
>>Skip Williams wrote:
>> >
>> > I for one want to see that 160/3.5. That'd be a new one. Do you
pictures
>> > of the 100/2, 160/3.5, 500/5.6, 800/9 , or the1200/14? Or are they
just
>> > drawings?
>> >
>>
>>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
>-----------------------------------------------
>Skip Williams
>Westfield, NJ
>skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
>-----------------------------------------------
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|