Subject: | Re: 50/2 macro min aperture was RE: [OM] new user |
---|---|
From: | Acer V <siddim01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 20 Nov 1999 11:43:41 -0800 (PST) |
<snip> So for any given aperture, longer lenses will have a physically larger diameter aperture relative to shorter focal length lenses, and is this why they can stop down further (200/4 goes to f:32 IIRC). /Acer V -- Whole Sort Of General Mish Mash <http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] (Fwd) B&H Sigma 14mm/f3.5 lens, Giles |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: video card/monitor doing justice to image was Re: [OM] scanners for dummies, Acer V |
Previous by Thread: | Re: 50/2 macro min aperture was RE: [OM] new user, John A. Lind |
Next by Thread: | Re: 50/2 macro min aperture was RE: [OM] new user, John A. Lind |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |