Charlie wrote:
> Question, I was told that (color) negatives do not scan as
> well as trans.
> No reason given, just a confident statement by one of those *experts*
> at the local one hour lab. Is this true???
> Negatives do have more information than trans, no?
> I mean latitude, so there would be more shadow detail etc.
> if the exposure was equal to the transparency.
As far as colour balance is concerned, that is what I have found too. Seems
to be a lot of variation between brands and also some within brands. I
think the reason for this is that the manufacturers don't have to worry as
much about colour balance because it can be corrected at the printing stage.
I have also noticed that colour balance seems to go "off" with over/under
exposure.
Wayne Harridge
Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|