Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] [Fwd: Bokeh]

Subject: Re: [OM] [Fwd: Bokeh]
From: "Ron Spolarich" <caesar2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 1999 07:43:33 -0500
Ahh, so this is bokeh and badbokeh at that!  I guess I can put my Capt.
Midnight decoder ring away now that I realize bokeh isn't an acronym!!
Sheesh!

caesar2@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Ron & Mary Spolarich
www.mscollectibles.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Goss <steveg3@xxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus-digest <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 05, 1999 11:24 PM
Subject: [OM] [Fwd: Bokeh]


>
> > Note that on Acer's page there's an exellent example of very bad bokeh,
he
> > has even named that picture "badbokehbells" :) This picture was taken
with
> > the 50/3.5 Macro lens, which seems to have a reputation of having bad
bokeh.
> > ( http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01/BADBOKEHBELLS.JPG )
> >
> > I have also included two links to good bokeh pictures, the first one was
> > taken by Giles with the 180/2, and the second one was taken by me with
the
> > 100/2. You will notice that the backgrounds in these 2 pictures look
much
> > more pleasing than in Acer's picture.
> > ( http://www.taiga.ca/~gallery/subpages/stewart/bride.html )
> > ( http://members.xoom.com/olaf_greve/ojg_holl11.html )
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz