Subject: | RE: [OM] ADITL2 |
---|---|
From: | "Giles" <cnocbui@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 4 Nov 1999 00:42:08 +0000 |
I do not think having a gun bokeh lens is essential. The idea, from my perspective, is to try and make use of the idea that there can more to a photograph than the main subject (if it has one of course). Since I have become aware of bokeh and it's contribution to an image I have found myself considering backgrounds as an important element. If I am taking a photo with a main subject or focal point and and where there will be an out of focus background I may shift my point of view or the aperture used so as to give the most pleasing overall effect. A very good recent example of bokeh would be C.H. Ling's lovely photo of the two almost mirror image butterflies (?). Perhaps someone can repost the link for those who missed it. This shot has beautiful bokeh. The background is a lovely melange of green white and grey tones that absolutely make the picture for me. I think this shot embodies the idea that the subject is just a part of the whole - which to me is one of the main elements to explore with a bokeh theme. With bokeh as the subject of an ADITL I think the idea is similar to just sticking to a 50mm focal length in that it encourages the exploration of a way of seeing. Giles > > Would some of us be at a disadvantage if we did not have those lenses > > which produce the best bokeh? < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 24mm shift vs larger formats, Keith (R.K.) Berry |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] ADITL2, Giles |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [OM] ADITL2, Olaf Greve |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] ADITL2, W. J. Liles |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |