Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Re: Low light photography

Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Low light photography
From: "John Hermanson" <omtech@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 1999 18:09:48 -0400
I'm not sure.  Try it with and without and let us know if there's a
difference.

John
________________________________
Camtech, Olympus Service since 1977.
21 South La. Huntington, NY 11743
516-424-2121,  http://www.zuiko.com
________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: Dirk Wright <wright@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 29, 1999 2:33 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: Low light photography


> At 11:30 AM 10/29/99 -0400, you wrote:
> >Well, believe it or not, light makes its way around the mirror in "no
light"
> >situations and feeds the SBCs  dramatically shortening such a test
exposure.
> >Of course, when you're actually shooting in low/no  light, you wouldn't
need
> >the tape.
> >The first time I tested a plain 2 with the body cap on, auto exposure at
ASA
> >12 was very short and I thought "whoa, that CAN'T be right", so  on my
> >second attempt, I taped the eyepiece over and sure enough, the next
exposure
> >was much longer.
> >
>
> so i should tape the eyepiece when using pinhole?
>
> Be seeing you.
>
> Dirk Wright
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz