Subject: | Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF |
---|---|
From: | "Wiese" <wiese@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 16 Oct 1999 17:23:22 +1000 |
>> BTW, I made a quick and dirty test of Kodachrome 64, and it reflected >>about 1/3 >> stop more than the 18 0ray card. >Ahh, yes, but what does unexposed Kodachrome look like? >Foxy ...hmmm - the meter isn't reading unexposed film either, though... much, anyway <g> Andy < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] .... Zeiss Softar I....., claire |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Wiese |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, WKato |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Assumed reflectance of film for OTF, Wiese |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |