To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc:
From: Steven Read/CAM/Lotus @ NOTES@ALPHABETA
Date: 10/13/99 11:44:48 AM
Purely subjectively, the 180/2.8 is a marvel, it's bright, it's fast, easy to
focus, images are crisp, the color balance leads to drop dead gorgeous images.
It's also pretty darn big for a Zuiko, takes 72mm filters/caps et al and is 3 to
4 times more expensive. It's also, IMHO, comparitively worth the price. The
200/4 is smaller, but not at all loved by me, I much prefer it's cousin the
200/5 which seems to have better contrast than the 200/4 and isn't much slower.
___________________________________________________________
* * * Previous Memo History * * *
From: Leopoldo Sánchez Rodríguez <leopoldo.rodriguez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> @ ALPHABETA
Hi you Zuiko's owner!
I'd like to bring up another topic here, hoping that it won't be and old subject
fully discussed when I wasn't here.
How does the 200/f4 stand a comparison with the 180/f2.8 in terms of overall
performance?
Thanks,
Leopoldo
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|