I also found the 21/2 is a bit sharper than my 24/2, but the color of the
21/2 is a bit dull. My friend who have a brand new 21/2 brought from Japan
also have the same comment, what do you think? Anyone have experience to
share?
C.H.Ling
>At 01:19 PM 9/29/99 -0600, Garth wrote:
>
>>Well, I own a 28/2.0 Zuiko, and I've found that it's rapidly turning into
>>one of my all-time favorite lenses, and the single most-likely lens to be
>>mounted on my camera. If the 2.8 version has the same noticeable lack of
>>distortion as the 2.0, I'd say go with the 28mm.
>
>I agree, my personal favorite combination is the 28/2 plus the 21/2. The
>24 seems to be a compromise between these two. I have a photo I took
>with the 21/2 recently and scanned with the LS-2000 at max resolution.
>It's about a 3meg file, if anyone is interested I could make it
>available via ftp. I think the 21/2 is a better quality than my 24/2.
>
>Wayne
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|