~~~~~ Motor Sport Visions Photography said:
>
>I haven't a clue what titanium has to do with picture quality, can
>anyone fill me in here?
Good question ...
[...]
>Things that keep me remaining loyal to the OM system are the high level
>of quality and long term reliability (that I have personally
>experienced...) light weight, small size, and good ergonomics. If
>someday I am forced to move to an "advanced" system I am not even sure
>what way I would go...I suppose C*n*n. I keep holding out hope that
>Olympus will give us something in the high end that offers the ability
>to shoot fast. I have a feeling that won't happen though. Soon much of
>the type of work I do will be all digital I have a feeling anyway so I
>am very reluctant to dump large amounts of $$$ into a new film camera
>system.
>
>Commentary over...
Hear, hear Mike. I don't know what I would buy instead now. The Leica
system with bayonet fit lenses is too expensive for me (my wife will tell
me anyway) and the other systems are pretty big unless you go for the
little Pentax MZs.
Chris
><> *** Chris Barker ***
mailto:cmib@xxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|