Subject: | [OM] 35,40 amd 50 mm |
---|---|
From: | "LARS BUNDESEN" <lars.bundesen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 1999 21:59:08 +0200 |
Hi Oly fans out there Does anybody knbow what is the better lens: The 35/2.0, 40/2.0, or the 50/1.8 / 1.4? I have all 4 of these, but I am uncertain what is better. I like the compactness of the 40 mm and the angle of view, but I am not certain if it equals the 35/2.0 in quality. Lars Bundesen < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Olympus Centurion APS any good?, Per Nordenberg |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Digital [was: I just caught wind that Canon is coming out with an EOS 3n], Richard Ross |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] Olympus Centurion APS any good?, Per Nordenberg |
Next by Thread: | [OM] 35,40 amd 50 mm, sje |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |