I don't mean to sound uppity, but I believe that the Olympus RC is also an
shutter-preferred auto camera. At lease mine is.
I also use a Pen ED that I keep loaded. These two take great pictures, but
the RC is more versatile. The Pen's only have a 1/200 shutter speed
outdoors. My ED then varies the aperture according to the meter. The RC
has full manual and SS from 1/15 to 1/500.
I also use an XA sometimes, it's great too.
Skip
At 9/24/99 09:58 AM -0600, you wrote:
Good Morning:
Depending on the situation, I usually carry either an Olympus Pen-S or
Olympus 35 RC. Both are manual. If I am in a hurry and need
auto-exposure, my choice is Olympus 35DC which has the 40mm f1.7 lens.
Best to all, Mike
>Wayne (obviously trying to distract us from the all consuming SUV
>discussion) wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>
>
>>Dirk Wright Wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I've been eyeing the old 35SP series of rangefinder olympus cameras as
>>> "carry-all" small cameras that will fit in my briefcase. I
>>> supposed I'd be
>>> better off with a Stylus or similar point and shoot camera, but I was
>>> wondering about the praticality of using these old rangefinder cameras
>>> with non-interchangeable lenses as "have-it-with-you" type of
>>> camera. I'm
>>> not a very good photographer in my opinion, but it may be
>>> good for me to
>>> spend some time over lunch to wander around outside and take
>>> some snaps. I
>>
>>I bought a 35SPn quite cheaply a few months ago and have been using it a
>>little in the way you suggest. It fits reasonably well in one of the
>>compartments of the case I carry my laptop in, so goes with me to work each
>>day. I find it useful as a "reco" camera, if I see something interesting I
>>will take a shot with the 35SPn and the resulting print acts as a reminder
>>for me to go back with an OM and the appropriate lenses to finish the job.
>>By the way, you won't be disappointed with the performance of the 42mm f1.7
>>Zuiko.
>
>
>I concur. Been carrying an LC (Learner Camera?) with the same (at least I
>would imagine it is) 42mm/1.7 on dog walks etc.. and I'm quite pleased w/
>the results. The 35spn is supposed to have a much better (spot) meter
>system, so if I can ever find one at the right price I'd like to pick one
>up. The only problem is that it is a little too big to carry all the
>time--an XA, a Stylus, a 35rc (w/ 42/2.8), or even god forbid a Canonette
>might be handy. Of course there are other small rangefinders w/ excellent
>lenses, but the tend to cost considerably more than $50-75.
>
>Glen
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
Mike Stoesz, VP
Rainbow Photography Inc.
213 Grand Av.
Laramie, Wy., USA
82070
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
-----------------------------------------------
Skip Williams
Westfield, NJ
skipwilliams@xxxxxxxxx
-----------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|