Thank you !.
I do the same with my scanner and here is the results.
the film scan
http://www.medialab.ntua.gr/mavridis/images/q60r1.jpg
the transparent film scan
http://www.medialab.ntua.gr/mavridis/images/q60e1.jpg
note that the transparent film is 8 times bigger than a 35mm slide. I have
scan 35mm slide but the quality it was not acceptable (too blur - not
contrast)
King regards
Babis Mavridis
http://www.medialab.ntua.gr/mavridis/
----- Original Message -----
From: Harridge, Wayne <Wayne.Harridge@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 1999 2:15 PM
Subject: RE: [OM] OT - Microtek Scanmaker 35T Plus 35mm Slide and Negative
Scanner
> > I will like to see that, if it's easy to place it somewhere
> > in your website
> > for download.
> > I can do the same for the microtek scanmaker III with
> > transparent film,
> > and/or normal page if some one else interesting - even if I
> > know that this
> > model is not on sale any more, there are other similar models
> > from microtek.
>
> Here is the link: http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/q60.jpg
>
> No HTML or explanation on the page, this is a scan with default settings
> using the Microtek ScanMaker 35t plus of a Kodak Q60 calibration
> transparency.
>
> Wayne Harridge
> Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
> http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
