Harrisons wrote:
> performance, but the little dinky flowers are not much of the FOV. I might
> prefer a good macro lens, but I have not seen a reasonable one.
Reasonable, Do you mean price or performace? If the latter then a 90mm f2
macro
with an extension tube or an 80mm f4 should suit you.
Does anyone know how a 90mm f2 + the close-up lens for the 80mm f4 performs?
A cheap camera the 4Ti is not. I think it more correct to say that if the
batteries
die 'you' have left it dead in the water if you aren't carrying spares. The
batteries in my 4Ti have been in it for close on a year now. It could be a
year as
I can not recall exactly when I put them in 8-)
Since you have an interest in macro photography you should take a look at the
Benbos
or Unilocks. They make short versions, which would be lighter, if you require
a
specialist tripod.
Giles
I am happy
> Tripod - Sometimes when near home. Perhaps I should get a modern one which
> Alex's comment about why not an OM4Ti is harder to deal with. I like the
> fully mechanical system, sheer prejudice from having other, cheap cameras
> leave me dead in the water with a low battery. I also like the noises of
> the mechanical innards, feel like a human being thought it out and crafted
> it - irrational, but I like it.
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|