In a message dated 99-08-30 00:03:57 EDT, you write:
> Since reflected meters assume scene is 18 grey, they have to be
> over-ridden in special cases (a la the 4s shadow and hilite button), yes?
An averaging meter usually always works. It falls down when the scene is very
high contrast, in backlighting situations, when your subject is in a shadow,
etc. The first solution with spot metering is to meter your main subject and
work from there. If you take multiple spots and all the spots are within the
latitude of the particular film you are using, you will get a useable
exposure. If the spots exceed the film latitude you have to make a choice
about what your main subject is and expose accordingly. The hilite and
shadow button more or less guarantee that you will get white whites and black
blacks so it's a special subset of spot metering and not a solution for all
special cases.
> What about incident? Are they immune to this kind of error?
> Say, I'm in a valley, and there are black shadows under some overhangs and
> sunlit rocks in the general scene. Reflected metering will try to render
> it all 18%, so the lucky 4 user takes a spot off the shadow and hits
> shadow on the body to u/expose by 2.x stops getting proper black shadows.
> (or, the smart non-2S/3/4 users simply does it manually <G>). What would
> an incident say?
If you are using the incident meter positioned at the subject and pointed
back at the camera, then you are measuring the actual light hitting the
subject. The lucky OM4 user will take multiple spots and decide whether or
not he/she wants to have any detail in the shadows, or wants to have the
highlights blown out, makes a choice depending on the subject matter, and
pops more spots to bias the exposure toward one direction or adjusts the
compensation dial accordingly. (That's one way anyway.) Incident is useful
for portraits and places you can walk to to take the reading at the subject
(studios). You can also take an incident from camera position if you can
accurately posit that the lighting for the subject is the same as that at the
camera.
> I hope this theoretical example makes sense and suits the question at
> hand. My track record of late has been less than stellar.
> OM content: I'm beginning to like the 50/1.8MC wide open for low light
> candid portraits (such as when the adorable little sister is about to fall
> asleep :-))
>
>
Low light candid portraits are difficult because usually the lighting is much
contrastier than we imagine. Lacking a spot meter, go right up to you
slumbering sister and take a reading off of her face.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|