Thanks for the advice.
Regards,
Elmer Brum
Toronto, Canada
[mailto:] elmerb@xxxxxxxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of *- DORIS FANG -*
Sent: Sunday, August 29, 1999 8:35 AM
To: 'Olympus List'
Subject: Re: [OM] Portrait Lens
On Fri, 27 Aug 1999, Elmer Brum wrote:
> Any suggestions?
> I guess I should start out
> with a good portraiture lens, any suggestions?
A lot depends on the way you do portraits, what sort of perspective you
favor, DOF, your working room, etc. etc. There's lots of lenses in the OM
line-up that will do just fine for portraiture. Don't forget that
Cartier-Bresson did most of his portraits (which tend to be environmental)
with a 50mm.
So..in the OM line-up...you'd have the family of 50's (1.8, 2.0, 1.4,
1.2), the 85/2, 90/2, 100/2.8 & 2.0, 135/3.5 & 2.8, 180/2.8 & 2.0,
200/4, the 35-70's, 35-80, 35-105, 75-150, 65-200, 100-200, 85-250 etc.
But I'd recommend --- unless you have specific requirements ---
the 85/2.0, 100/2.8 or 100/2.0
*= Doris Fang =*
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|