At 01:29 AM 25-08-99 +0200, "Klaus Schroiff" <kschroiff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>There're some consistency checks in the database engine and one
>prevents you from entering worse results for stopped-down vs. wide-open
>performance.
>In my experience I've never seen a lens that did not benefit from
>stopping down a bit and I've some heavy doubts that a wide-angle
>lens is really capable of this.
>"stopped-down" refers roughly to wide-open + 1 or 2 f-stops and not
>f/32 or so. Beyond f/16 the quality will usually deteriorate
>quite rapidly obviously.
Why do you say ".....obviously"?
jh
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|