Subject: | Re: [really OT] (was: Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium) |
---|---|
From: | Richard Ross <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 08 Aug 1999 12:18:49 +0100 |
Jan wrote: >I don't know why the Concorde doesn't seem to have the same problem. >Perhaps because it "only" goes a bit over Mach 1. IIRC a Concorde is capable of well over Mach 2. Three of them will be chasing Wednesday's eclipse, extending totality to nearly 9 minutes! Cheers Richard Richard Ross Hemel Hempstead, England rhdesign@xxxxxxxxxxxxx < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM]baseboard Analyser [wasLeica vs Om, Richard Ross |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [really OT] (was: Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium), Richard Ross |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [really OT] (was: Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium), Acer Victoria |
Next by Thread: | Re: [really OT] (was: Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium), ClassicVW |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |