Subject: | Re: Re[4]: [OM]Leica vs Om (was Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested) |
---|---|
From: | Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 07 Aug 1999 21:16:25 -0500 |
At 03:46 PM 8/7/1999 +0100, you wrote: >I didn't return and promised myself that when I 'grew up' I wouldn't be such >a stick-in-the-mud fuddy-duddy, but now when I hear myself tut-tut at the >mention of snip > >Regards, >Keith Berry (Birmingham, England) >keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx > Keith, I like it when you tut-tut. Cheers, Joel Joel Wilcox Iowa City, Iowa USA < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] The Vert & Toky Saga 1999 reprint part 4: "As the Focus Ring Turns -- New Episode", Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] ADITL2, Acer Victoria |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[4]: [OM]Leica vs Om (was Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested), Keith (R.K.) Berry |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re[4]: [OM]Leica vs Om (was Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested), Acer Victoria |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |