ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OM] OT

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium

from Richard Ross

Subject:	Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium
From:	Richard Ross <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sat, 07 Aug 1999 10:52:16 +0100

At 11:16 07/08/99 +0800, Sean wrote:
>Well, although my OM-4Ti is tonnes lighter than my EOS-3, I
>don't think it's because of the titanium content.

Hans' E-SIF specifies the OM-4Ti's weight as 510g vs the OM-4's 540g

So it does make a difference!

Richard
Richard Ross
Hemel Hempstead, England
rhdesign@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] OM] OT - Titanium, DaEyeGuy Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Charles Loeven Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Gary Edwards Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Sean Chan Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Richard Ross <= Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, ClassicVW Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Charles Loeven Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Acer Victoria Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Giles Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, RK Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Giles Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, ClassicVW Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Richard Schaetzl Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Richard Ross Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, epozar

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] (Fwd) news message., Harridge, Wayne
Next by Date:	Re: Re[4]: [OM]Leica vs Om (was Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested), Richard Ross
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, Sean Chan
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM] OT - Titanium, ClassicVW
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]