Subject: | Re: Re[2]: [OM] Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested |
---|---|
From: | *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Aug 1999 12:28:40 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Barry B. Bean wrote: > Given that there is a consensus that Leica > is a high quality camera, why would we criticize someone who simply > opted for a different brand than we did? Amen, Brother Bean. Many of us own more than one brand, and it doesn't mean we're not dedicated Zuiks. *= Doris Fang =* < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: Re[2]: [OM] Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested, *- DORIS FANG -* |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM in Encarta 99!!!, Omer Nezih GEREK |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: [OM] Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested, Barry B. Bean |
Next by Thread: | Re: Re[2]: [OM] Mandler 50mm f/2 Summicron-M tested, John Hudson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |