At 19:16 30-07-99 +0200, "Ángel Lobo" <angel.lobo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I always like the LEICA M System (and others), but for a lot of reasons I
>like very much the OLYMPUS OM System.
>
>On April 1998 one friend of mine wants to sell me a Leica M 2 plus a lens
>Summicron 50 mm f 2.
>
>During a week I have with me the M 2 and the Summ. with the intention of to
>do a parallel test vs the OM 1n with the Zuiko 50 1.8 " MC " (not the
>plastic "made in Japan"). I put on every camera a roll of Sensia II 100 ASA
> and a new battery 625 on the OM1n, the camera that I use as light metter.
What are the differences between an MC 50 / 1.8 "plastic, made in Japan"
Zuiko and an MC 50 / 1.8 Zuiko? I have an MC 50 / 1.8 which says "made in
Japan" round the inside of the front of the lens and has "Japan" along with
the serial number engraved into a ring at the base of the lens next to the
bayonet mount ring. Do I have the "plastic" lens?
jh
ps: I have also made comparisons of slides taken with my various Zuiko lens
and my various M lenses.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|