Jay Maynard wrote
>No, I'm not referring to the bare facts, but rather a compilation of the
>lore surrounding them...like the 50/1.8's superb all-around performance,
the
>55/1.2's reputed softness, etcetera.
I'd be interested too. Any mention of a 50mm seems to invite flames from
some Zuikoholics, perhaps because having spent a fortune on expensive glass,
they don't like to be reminded that they could have excellent results from a
$20 lens.
Regards,
Keith Berry (Birmingham, England)
keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|