Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: was [OM] 200/4/now Richard S. joke

Subject: Re: was [OM] 200/4/now Richard S. joke
From: "Tom Trottier" <tom@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 23:43:59 -0400
Spoilsport!

--- Original Message ---
From:                   "gary edwards" <maitani@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date sent:              Thu, 22 Jul 1999 10:49:08 PDT
Send reply to:          olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Oops.  And I always laughed at the other guys who didn't get the joke.
> Gary

> >From: Richard Schaetzl <Richard.Schaetzl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Date: Thu, 22 Jul 1999 17:14:47 +0200
> >
> >Gary Edwards schrieb:
> > >
> > > Afraid it won't work.  Light bleed from the adjacent unmasked exposures
> > > will contaminate the contrast evaluation.
> >
> >Yes, I know and division would go straight through the "sweet-spot" the
> >center of the lens.
> >My remark was meant to be humorous (it faild obiviously).
> > >
...
> > > > Halfframe? I haven´t thought of it, but that would be a great idea,
> > > > just think: Taking the first exposure with the lens to test and one of
> > > > this split-image-vignetting filters, ...
...
------------------
From:Tom Trottier, ACT Productions Inc.
    __o  tom@xxxxxx  http://www.act.ca
  _ \<   +1 613 594-4829  fax +1 613 594-8944
(*)/'(*) 199 Holmwood Ave, Ottawa, Ontario Canada K1S 2P3
"Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler" - Einstein

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz