On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Bau Struye wrote:
>I apologize if they have been answered already although, if such is the case, I
>could not find where.
>
>- 35-80 cost: Exactly what makes it SO much more expensive then other zooms in
>that range (such as the 35-70 or 35-105)? Is it just the f2.8 aperture?
Probably the large constant aperture. See below.
>- 24mm f2.8: Were there multiple version of it such as SC and MC or are they
>all the same?
See below again.
>- 35-70 f3.6 vs f4. Is the latter one a newer version? A short stint with
>both at the camera store reveled that the f4 was somewhat easier to work with.
> Is this true? Are they both multicoated?
I suggest you saunter over to the Reese and Farrar lens pages, along with
the e-SIF page. Links to all will be found if you scroll down at
<http://student.ucr.edu/~siddim01/photo.html>. There, you'll find all
detailed information and specifications about the lenses, versions, etc.
There are a few more Oly links that I've yet to put up, but the
aforementioned should do well as a starting point. Best,
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|