Thanks for your reply - since you have a Pen F, there is no problem with
batteries, right? Also do you use the little meter that goes over the
shutter speed dial?
Stuart
Stuart Phillips
Assistant Director, Professional Training Programs
Division of Continuing Education
University of Massachusetts Boston
Tel: (617) 287 7289
Fax: (617) 287 7297
email: stuart.phillips@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: Rand E. [SMTP:rtomcala@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, July 22, 1999 5:56 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus Pen F
Stuart,
I too, am a Pen F user. I have the Pen FT and use it as an adjunct to
my OM System via the use of an "Pen F to OM" adapter (one on eBay at
this time). They also made quite a few other adapters for other make
lens also. Like Skip said, they are really well and solidly built and
were a true system camera with probably 75 to 100 different components
made and were quite popular here in the US. I recently purchased one of
the Pen range finder cameras (Pen S) and was pleased to find the
construction to be of the same standard as the Pen F series. I also was
surprised when I jokingly requested an operating manual for the FT from
Olympus (1-800-622-6372) and they did send me a photocopy of one.
Olympus, for all their faults, still a great company.
Rand E.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Skip Williams wrote:
>
> Stuart,
>
> I've had a Pen FT for about 9 months and I really like it. I've got a
> 40/1.4 and a 100/3.5. The Pen F's It's a real small gem, easy
> handling, and solid. The Pen F is a double stroke, meterless body.
> The Pen FT adds single stroke shutter cocking and a TTL meter (it uses
> PX625's). The meter isn't coupled to the lens though, you must
> transfer the meter reading (1-7) to a special scale on FT/FV lenses.
> Older F lenses do not have the meter number scale on the aperture
> ring. The Pen FV deletes the meter from the FT. Since the partially
> silvered mirror is the light's path to the meter cell, you lose light
> on an FT vs FV/F (An original Modern Photo test says 2 stops loss,
> Steven Gandy at his CameraQuest site says 1/2 stop). But I see about
> 50 FT's for sale for 1 FV. If brightness is an issue, go with the F.
> Just be aware of its shorter, double stroke winding lever. The FT/FV
> lenses fit fine on the F.
>
> I'm intending to assemble a "full" system, but I don't want to pay
> through the nose. Look on my page at
> http://www.skipwilliams.com/Zuiko_Ebay_History.htm to see recent Ebay
> Pen lens prices.
>
> As for body + lens prices, this is the most I'd pay with the 38/1.4,
> $40-60 more for the 40/1.4: F: $200, FT: $250 ($50-100 more for
> black), FV $300.
>
> If you're looking for info, the following two have all the poop.
> http://members.aol.com/xkaes/olympus.htm
> http://www.jetlink.net/~cameras/olypenf.htm
>
> The camera seems to be popular, there's someone buying all those Pen
> F/FT's on EBay. There's a few fans on this list, most vocal is
> Francisco Mostaccio <francescoarg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> from Argentina.
>
> I have not done any real tests on the lenses, but they've been rated
> very good. My few B&W rolls have been nice and sharp.
>
> Skip
>
> At 7/20/99 08:46 PM -0400, you wrote:
>
> > Is anyone on the list actively using an Olympus Pen system? I am
> > contemplating buying a Pen F and would like to discuss a few things.
> >
> > Stuart Phillips
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|