I am very lucky that the 90/2 I sold last year was come back to me again, I
had never gave this lens and myself a chance to understand each other in
deep. I always feel it hard to handle for macro. Due to its weight and focal
length, I need at least 1/250s for hand held shooting. Last year when I
found its performance is not as good as the 100/2 at distance object, I
sold it for other OM stuffs.
Well, with so many people praise about this lens, I will try to use this
lens more and see if I will fall in love with it.
C.H.Ling
>At 05:16 PM 7/14/99 -0700, you wrote:
>>Following up on Gary's glowing report on the testing of the 90 / f2 macro
I
>>checked with a local Olympus dealer on the current sticker price.
>>
>>Wow .......... it's up there somewhere near the cost of Leica glass!
>>
>>Are there any list members lens who have images to see and perhaps a write
>>up on their experience of using this lens?
>>
>
>Not only is it extremely sharp, the 90 has that exquisite color rendition
that
>is often associated with the best Zeiss and Leica glass. Seeing a web image
>would not really do it justice.
>
>
>
>________________________________
>Regards,
>Denton Taylor
>
>Photogallery at www.dentontaylor.com.
>Panoramas and Immersive Imaging at
> www.threehundredsixty.com
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|