At 01:49 PM 7/14/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>> The very first lens mentioned is the 8/2.8.Also, the macros
>> 20/3.5 and 38/3.5, and tele 1000/11.
>
>I believe there are some list members with the 8/2.8 (Denton, maybe?). The
>20/3.5 and 38/3.5 were the predecessors to the current 20/2.0 and 38/2.8.
>They did not mount directly on the body, but instead needed some sort of
>adapter. I think they were really more like microscope objectives, at least
>in their physical configuration (perhaps optically, too?). The 1000/11 is
>pretty rare, I think. It would be interesting to see how that one works with
>the OM-1 shutter shudder!
>
>Paul Schings
>Coventry, Rhode Island
Hi Paul I do indeed have the 8 2.8. I had a 20 3.5 for a while and you are
correct in the configuration.
If I had a 1000 I would remember to be thankful that the OM1 has MLU!
I have a few shots taken with the 8mm on my website below.
________________________________
Regards,
Denton Taylor
Photogallery at www.dentontaylor.com.
Panoramas and Immersive Imaging at
www.threehundredsixty.com
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|