Subject: | Re: [OM] 40/2 |
---|---|
From: | "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:24:32 +1000 |
> >It's cost. > > > >Foxy > > > >> I've read here and there that the 40/2 is a classic lens. What makes it so > >> special? > > Meaning it was cheap? Cheaper than the ubiquitous 50/1.8? > Expensive, and getting more so. Foxy < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Brand new OM2n Owner Has Perplexing Focus Question., Acer Victoria |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Sunny 16?OT re. loony f/4, Jan Steinman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 40/2, Acer Victoria |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 40/2, rockwell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |