Paul Farrar wrote
>An OM-G (OM-20) might be better. They usually cost less when you count the
>cost of the manual adapter for the 10, are very similar in most respects,
>but have the newer, more-reliable shutter, and some extra features (I think
>a PC connector), and are younger.
...or an OM-PC (OM-40), one of the nicest to use SLRs that I've ever tried.
I bought an OM-10 when it first came out and disliked it quite a lot - it
felt cheap, plasticky and sounded clattery. I was very relieved to swap it
for a second OM-1n body at the time.
Regards,
Keith Berry (Birmingham, England)
keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|