Hello zuickophiles,
I am considering a Tamron 90mm macro purchase, and thought they were all
2.5's, and have discovered a 2.8...which is considerably more expensive.
Any help you might throw my way to enlighten will be most appreciated. Is
the 2.8 THAT MUCH BETTER? Is the 2.5 still a great lens, or is the 2.8 that
has the reputation for excellence?
Thanks,
Chris
___________________________________________________________
Chris Johns lc-johns@xxxxxxxx
Center for Economic Entomology 217.265.0669
Illinois Natural History Survey fax: 217.333.8076
607 E. Peabody Drive lab: 217.333.5276
Champaign, Illinois 61820
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|