Has anyone used the hood (clamp on type) for the 50/1.4 & 35/2.8 on a
50/1.2? I have a feeling that it should work, but I've been too lazy to
test.
Glen
-----Original Message-----
From: Keith (R.K.) Berry <keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: June 11, 1999 8:13 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Viginetting - hoods and filter?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jerry Stackhouse
>Subject: [OM] Vignetting - hoods and filter?
>
>
>>I ran into some viginetting when I put a polarizer and a rubber hood onto
a
>>28-70 zoom. Hoya filter and hood.
>>
>>Are there any rules of thumb for the number of filter rings that we can
put
>>on the ends of our Zuikos without affecting the image? I'd like to use a
>>sky or a polarizer with a hood - that would be a total of 2 filter rings.
>>I'd like to do this on a 50/1.4, 50/1.8, 100/2.8, 28/2.8.
>>
>I've used the screw in hood that came with the 28mm f3.5 Zuiko with a 1A
>filter without vignetting problems, and for the 50mm f1.8, and 35 - 70mm
>f3.5-f4.5 Zuiko zoom lenses I use an Olympus clamp-on rubber hood with a
>filter. The advantage of the clamp-on as against a screw in hood is that it
>can be slid right back to the aperture ring if need be, to prevent it from
>adding to the depth. It still has to be clamped to the front ring of a
>polariser though or you can't rotate it!
>Can't recall ever seeing vignetting on any of my exposures, but maybe
that's
>me, as I can't see any on my XA pictures either.
>Regards,
>Keith Berry (Birmingham, England)
>keith_r.k.berry@xxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|