I'll be honest, I haven't read the emails yet. I saw them, gave them a quick
glance, realised I would need this info soon, and moved them to a folder for
posterity.
Foxy
----- Original Message -----
> Thnks Foxy, I have one comment: I'm not sure what the poster means by
> 'lens efficiency'. It seems a bit counter-intuitive. To have a good
> chance of getting a meteor, 2 things are important in a lens: speed and
> angle of coverage. He's got the speed right, but using his calculation,
> a 100/2 is 4 times better than a 24/2 ?? Well, maybe if you're
> prescient enuf to point the 100 at the exact spot where the meteor will
> streak by. Carrying his calculations further, the ultimate Zuiko for
> meteors is the 250/2 @ 62.5. Somehow that doesn't work for me.
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|