Were not worthy!!!!! ;-)
Terry
kelton wrote:
> It recently dawned on me why the MC lenses often do better than the SC
> lenses in the Reese tests. It's because the multi-coating adds additional
> mass and weight to the lens, causing the lens to vibrate less, resulting
> in sharper images. This *must* be true, because my 200 and 300 telephotos
> are both MC, and they are MUCH heaver than my SC 50/1.8 and my SC 21/3.5.
> The obvious conclusion is that the multi-coating adds weight and thus,
> precious inertia, and thus, sharper images. I can't believe all the rest
> of you smart cookies missed this obvious conclusion. (Oh yeah, I forgot.
> The smart people already left the list.) Well, fortunately you've still
> got ME to accurately and correctly explain the complexities of physics to
> you.
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|