If it's balanced, the vibrations on either side reinforce each other.
Otherwise the vibrations decay faster and become more random & jumbled.
Like the difference between the tone from a crystal wine glass and a
plain one.
Tom
> Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 16:41:31 +1000
> From: "Terry and Tracey" <foxcroft@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] No LLS on the 250
>
> If it is balance, there is nothing to damp out the vibrations. I only
> realised this with a post from someone recently.
>
> Foxy
>
> - ----- Original Message -----
>
> > In a message dated 5/30/99 8:20:27 PM EST, kelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> writes:
> >
> > << I've always thought a person was supposed to use
> > the hole at which the lens/camera naturally balanced, but Gary
> > enlightened me, explaining that using an UNBALANCED mounting point
> > would lessen the effect of vibrations. Makes sense to me, now that I
> > think about it. >>
> >
> > Can someone explain it to me, so it makes sense?
> > George S.
------------------
From: Tom Trottier, President, ACT Productions Inc.
infoanim@xxxxxx http://www.act.ca
+1 613 594-4829 fax +1 613 594-8944
199 Holmwood Ave, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 2P3
"Make it as simple as possible, but no simpler" - Einstein
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|