ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Is Contax the future?

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] Is Contax the future?

from Charles Loeven

Subject:	Re: [OM] Is Contax the future?
From:	"Charles Loeven" <cpl49@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 28 May 1999 09:16:27 -0400

Denton wrote,

<<In fact, if you wanna get real, you can't even easily get a BATTERY for an
OM1...>>

And we really don't need one.
That is the beauty of this little gem.

Charlie L.



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] Is Contax the future?, Keith (R.K.) Berry Re: [OM] Is Contax the future?, Denton Taylor Re: [OM] Is Contax the future?, Charles Loeven <= Re: [OM] Is Contax the future?, Denton Taylor RE: [OM] Is Contax the future?, Jerry Stackhouse RE: [OM] Is Contax the future?, Denton Taylor RE: [OM] Is Contax the future? OT, Acer Victoria RE: [OM] Is Contax the future? OT, Denton Taylor RE: [OM] Is Contax the future? OT, Acer Victoria RE: [OM] Is Contax the future?, - DORIS FANG - RE: [OM] Is Contax the future?, John A. Lind RE: [OM] Is Contax the future?, Harridge, Wayne RE: [OM] Is Contax the future?, George Sears

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Good-bye. Me too., Charles Loeven
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] OT about punching up colors, Barry B. Bean
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Is Contax the future?, Denton Taylor
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Is Contax the future?, Denton Taylor
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]