Tim wrote:
> probably too much work. Interestingly the OM2S is still
> substantially analog
> not digital using an integrator and comparator for auto exposure.
>
Now that's interesting, from what I'd heard on this list the 2s was more
like the 4 than the 2/2n. Looks like the electronics are closer to the
2/2n.
Wayne Harridge
Ivanhoe, Victoria, Australia
http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Louvre/6152/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|