Very generous offer, John. And important points.
george
John Petrush wrote:
>
> I like the concept of some sort of evaluation and critique. For the thin of
> skin, who may be offended by such comments, you have two magnificent
> opportunities - 1. to learn more about your photography technique and vision
> and 2. how to thicken your hide a little. Both valuable. This group has
> been outstanding at dealing with the occasional "flare-up" and maintaining
> civility.
>
> Regarding how to digitize, I will scan any entry with my humble little film
> scanner (neg or slide). Just mail your original and enclose a SASE for the
> return trip. Contributions of 350mm f/2.8's or 24mm shifts graciously
> accepted. <g> Seriously, I'd be pleased to do a few dozen scans every other
> month or so at web page resolutions (say 800x600 pixels) for any submitting
> list member to help this effort moving forward.
>
> As for a 50mm only - bring it on :)
>
> Regarding how to tally votes - there several ways to approach it. One way
> is to pick first, scond and third in rank order and assign values. Another
> way to to select your favorite three, without ranking. Any uniformily
> applied way will work. As for naming names - entries should be anonymous
> for voting, but afterward the names should be made available. MHO.
>
> John P
> ______________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|