At 02:44 PM 5/21/99 -0500, Ken you wrote:
>Well, yesterday Joel Wilcox and I got together with the purpose of keeping
>the film manufactures in business.
>
Yes, folks, I have seen Vert and Toky in their innertube-wrapped glory. For
the amount of hiking we did in relation to exposures taken, I'd say the
hiking boot manufacturers won the day. But it's quality not quantity, right?
>I think Joel had
>another bag hidden away in the 30 gallon tuppewear box, but he didn't seem
>too inclined to carry that into the woods on our hikes.
>
You're right. It's my "macro" bag. But if I hadn't just gotten the 85-250,
which I was eager to use, I'd have probably carried that bag instead of the
other one. The 85-250 doesn't pack in my existing bags very well. I'm not
sure how others tote this lens with other more "normal-sized" gear, but I'm
still working on my ergonomics. Still, it's a good problem, I think :)
By contrast, Ken had his kit pared down to a familiar and useful nub. I was
impressed with his Tokina ATX 35-70 zoomer. I couldn't believe what it can
do with Vert. Incidentally, the saga of Vert and Toky came to a swift
denouement as a result of the sudden, unexpected appearance of my Vivitar
extension tubes ... More to come (I'm sure)...
>We drove a little ways from his house to a spot where we had to get
>permission to trespass from this guy that spoke with his body language.
Never met a snarly guy in house slippers I didn't like.
>Joel, being the local, went and talked with him, but I was wondering for a
>minute whether or not we needed to make a quick getaway. Fortunately, the
>guy actually was friendly (just liked to scare people, I guess) and told us
>where to park and hike. Unfortunately there wasn't any trail and
>everything was a little soggy and overgrown. I suppose there was a trail a
>generation or two ago. We got a few pictures before heading off to other
>spots.
>
snipping the part about Joel's feats of tripod-wielding strength and
swiftness, from which he is still recovering...
>
>Throughout the day we did our obligitory "show and tell" routines as we
>opened up our camera bags and pulled out yet another piece of Olympus
>collectible. I guess my camera bag is getting pretty thin as I offered to
>sell him something and he felt sorry that my bag was already down to
>sub-minimums. I couldn't even con him into buying a varimagnifinder.
Maybe if he hadn't kept calling it his "Varimaggotfinder." I was pretty
impressed with the diopter for his IS-3 (which he didn't bring; next time,
eh, Ken?). Amazing what that thing will do on a lowly 75-150, with no
light loss.
>The
>ingrate that I am--I ridiculed his Sigma 21-35 zoom AFTER he gave me a roll
>of film AND bought my lunch.
>
I quoted my favorite little adaptable poem as I handed him the much-derided
lens:
A little barrel now and then
Is relished by the best of men.
He actually *apologized* to his OM-2S before putting the Sigmoid on his
apparently hitherto unbesmerched OM-2S. Geesh.
>I did show him Vert and Toky. I guess he never saw a lens with a hunk of
>bicycle innertube around it before.
>
And I forgot to ask what size innertube, because I'm gonna put some on my
2X-A.
>It had been a long time since I went hiking with another photographer and I
>really enjoyed it. For the past couple of years my cameras have been aimed
>at subjects that "pay" and I've neglected nature subjects. If I could
>recenter my photography back in nature (and it payed enough to warrent
>blowing off eddings/corporate dodads/etc), I'd get an OM-4T and a couple
>macro lenses and forget ever going autofocus. It was interesting seeing
>how our shooting styles were vastly different. I never bracketed a single
>shot, nor did I take the OM-2S out of Auto mode. I did goof and not take
>the wobbly winder off the camera so my shots taken with the heavy lenses
>probably had some motion in them, but I eventually migrated to my 100/2.8
>lens anyway.
>
Ken said he thinks the 100/2.8 is the greatest 100mm lens in the world. I
hadn't realized that it is so deft and light. It's barely a mm longer than
my 85/2. Later I saw a couple wedding shots from Ken's portfolio, one
taken with the 100/2.8 and another with his MF camera. I couldn't tell the
difference. But mostly I was just dazzled by his artistry.
Out in the field, he looked through my 85-250/f5 at one point and noted my
1-13 screen. He allowed me to put the lens on his OM-2S with 2-4 screen.
Holy smokes! It was like the lens had gone from f5 to f2.8. Very
impressive. It's no wonder you rarely see people selling off their series
2 screens.
>The Columbine were out in force and just demanded to have their pictures
>taken. We did find Jack-in-the-Pulpit, but only one plant was suitable for
>photographing. We each took our turns while the skeeters made great
>inroads on making dinner out of us.
>
>Ken
>
Unfortunately, we were about 2 weeks beyond primetime in the woods and oak
savannahs. Sometimes May is the cruelest month, with conferences, school
picnics, weddings, etc. We'd been trying to find a date to get together
since the middle of March! It was a lot of fun to hike around with a great
photographer like Ken.
Joel
Joel Wilcox
Iowa City, Iowa USA
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|