George,
That was great! Thanks,
Brian Huber
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of George M. Anderson
Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 2:16 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Pop Photo correspondence
Folks;
I would like to present the e-mail correspondence I've been having with
Pop Photo over the 4T MLU issue. I'll not editorialize.
My first message to them:
"Thanks for an interesting article.
I was amazed by the resolution improvements of up to 3000n the F5 with
Mirror Lock Up.
**But** I think there was an oversight in the list of all current
cameras which have MLU. The OM-4Ti, like the Maxxum 9 and the PZ-1p
mentioned in the article, has a self-timer which locks-up the mirror
(and stops down the aperture) before the shutter opens. In the OM-4Ti
case, the pre-fire is set at 12 seconds.
I for one would like to see this corrected.
Thanks
George"
******************************************************
Their response:
"We have received similar messages from many other OM-4Ti owners, and
your are indded correct. However, a mirror lock that requires you to
wait 12 sec before the exposure is made is only useful with
stationary subjects."
******************************************************
My response:
"Thanks for responding.
The same argument can be made for a 2 second time delay.
George"
******************************************************
Them:
"I agree, but a 12-sec delay is even worse."
******************************************************
Me:
"Ok, well thanks for the dialog.
Do I wish the 4T had a 2 second option? You bet. But for shooting
landscapes, still lifes, macros, copy work, etc etc, 2 seconds is no
different than 12 as far as camera shake goes (and may, in fact, be
better-longer time for all harmonics to die down).
As for anything else, if you're shooting a bird or a moose or a flower
on a windy day, you can not rely on them holding still for 2 seconds any
more than for 12 seconds.
So, IMHO, the 2 second delay is better only because you can shoot more
frames in a given period of time.... And the 4T has mirror lockup as
defined in the article.
George"
******************************************************
Them:
"Frankly, I think that any mirror lock-up that relies on the self-timer
is a waste of time except under certain specific conditions, and is
not a real mirror lock-up. Mr. Keppler disagrees, and often uses the
2-sec lock-up feature on the copying stand and occasionally on the
microscope, claiming it is easier to actuate. He does not use it
for moving subjects."
******************************************************
Me:
"You have a point. Those 2 or 12 seconds are lost forever! However,
there can be no doubt that the photo will have a better chance of
having the best possible resolution using the self-timer MLU as
opposed to not. Keppler's tests proved that. Certainly this is
a better way to implement a self-timer than that used in, say,
the Nikon 8008 where the mirror stays down until the exposure
is taken.
Lastly, I hope the comments you've received from myself and other 4T
owners will be passed along to Mr.Keppler.
Thanks a lot for taking the time to answer.
George"
******************************************************
Them:
"My first statment to you was that we have recieved many similar
comments from other OM-4Ti owners. "We" includes Mr. Keppler."
******************************************************
Me:
"Please forgive my ignorance of who your 'we' was."
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|