Hans van Veluwen wrote:
>
> : Now, my conspiracy question should be obvious: Why are the 4Ti and 3Ti
> : not included in his list? Their self-timers do the same thing, albeit
> : 12 seconds before exposure.
>
> The OM-3 and OM-3Ti don't have a self-timer.
> It would have been nice if they had tested a 3Ti too.
> Gary, does the "Lens Test Fund" cover a 3Ti? ;-)
Yes, I flashed on this after I had sent the msg and verified it at Oly
website. Not having a 3Ti, I just assumed they wouldn't leave such an
important feature off a $1500 camera! Heck, even the original OM-1 had
a self timer.
>
> : Anybody know Keppler's e-mail address?
>
> No, but inside a PG I read:
>
> "Questions or comments on editorial content should be addressed to:
> Popular Photograhy, 1633 Broadway, New York, NY 10019.
> E-mail: mailto:popeditor@xxxxxxx
> We can't guarantee that we will answer all letters."
>
> Hnz
Thanks for this Hans. I sent the following e-mail to this address just
now. Anybody want to loin me in a push for a correction?
George
***********************************************
Thanks for an interesting article.
I was amazed by the resolution improvements of up to 3000n the F5 with
Mirror Lock Up.
**But** I think there was an oversight in the list of all current
cameras which have MLU. The OM-4Ti, like the Maxxum 9 and the PZ-1p
mentioned in the article, has a self-timer which locks-up the mirror
(and stops down the aperture) before the shutter opens. In the OM-4Ti
case, the pre-fire is set at 12 seconds.
I for one would like to see this corrected.
Thanks
George
*********************************************
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|