Subject: | Re: [OM] Pop photo anti-OM conspiracy? Was: Mirrror lockup effecting resolution |
---|---|
From: | PCACala@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Sun, 16 May 1999 12:02:31 EDT |
George writes: > Please be sure that the 50-250 results are no better than the 85-250. I > don't wanna have to lust after **another** lens! :>) It might just depend on if you compare the 50-250 with or without cradle. I predict that without it will show some image degradation due to vibration. But we'll see . . . > BTW, has anyone offered to loan a 35-80/2.8? Yup, I just hasn't happened, yet. Gary Reese Las Vegas, NV < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Pop photo anti-OM conspiracy? Was: Mirrror lockup effecting resolution, PCACala |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Pop Photo anti-OM conspiracy., George M. Anderson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Pop photo anti-OM conspiracy? Was: Mirrror lockup effectingresolution, Hans van Veluwen |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Pop Photo anti-OM conspiracy., George M. Anderson |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |