Clyde Soles wrote:
> >It's sort of embarrassing but Pop. Photo just did a comparison study of
> >mirror lockup with the OM1 and the OM4Ti without mirror lockup (obviously) or
> >mirror pre-fire. Between shutter speeds between 1/8 and 1/60 they found an
> >increase in resolution from between 13% to 43%.
>
> For those of us who don't bother with that mag, could you please clarify.
> Are you saying the 4 was better than the 1 with mlu?
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
Just got my POP. Photo and according to their test - An Om-1 produced
sharper number (with the mirror locked up) than the Om4Ti form a
range of 5sec. to 1/60.
Also the last sentence seems to hint that this is just the first of a
series os
article devoted to camera vibration. Most of the info is geared to Nikon but
it was mostly addressing the - mirror up vs. mirror down question. Also
in the same issue is an article on sharpness loss of long lense /tripod support
positions. DOESN"T THIS SOUND FAMILIAR?
yours I think this issue might be useful,
Garry D. Lewis
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|