Subject: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs.65/200mm F4) |
---|---|
From: | Pauls0627@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Fri, 7 May 1999 08:02:51 EDT |
In a message dated 5/6/99 7:53:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, rmydgy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Is It Possible that the OM-1 is an older camera and the damping needs to be > renewed? Darn. And here I was using silica gel to get the damp *out*. Paul Schings Coventry, Rhode Island, USA < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Canadian import duties; 16mm Zuiko; IS-30 problems, William Sommerwerck |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Diffuse Flash, Steve Lau |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs.65/200mm F4), Charles Loeven |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Oh, the cold, cold damp..., lclark |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |