Subject: | Re: [OM] OM vs Leica vs Zeiss--system versus system??? |
---|---|
From: | *- DORIS FANG -* <sfsttj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 6 May 1999 13:10:24 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 5 May 1999 ALEXSCIFI@xxxxxxx wrote: > So the question is this, if you are limited to just a single camera > body and 3 lenses, Leica M6 21/2.8 35/2.0 90/2.0 Why ? It fits my street shooting. Fast, incredibly accurate focus, short lag time, sturdy. Alternate ? Contax G2 (in many ways the better picture-maker) 21/2.8 35/2.0 90/2.8 SLR ? OM3ti 21/3.5 35/2.0 85/2.0 *= Doris Fang =* < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Subject: Re: [OM] 200/f4 + Shutter Shudders: (was "200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4), Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] Adapters, Pablo Fernandez |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM vs Leica vs Zeiss--system versus system???, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] OM vs Leica vs Zeiss--system versus system???, Richard Schaetzl |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |