Subject: | Re: [OM] 200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4 |
---|---|
From: | Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 03 May 1999 11:20:44 -0500 |
At 09:49 AM 5/3/99 -0400, Charlie you wrote: >I guess my non auto 7mm extension tube just went up in value. > Hi Charlie, With the 200/f4 you may have a very good point. Of course, now the thing to do is to re-test the lens with different support systems using that digital pointer. Let's see, we've got one of those around the office here ... Joel < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] George Mallory and Mt Everest, John Hudson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Archive Copies (was: fungus among us), Mark Dapoz |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4, Charles Loeven |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Springtime in Texas/Tamron 400/4, Gary Edwards |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |