On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, sam wrote:
>This post poses an interesting point: If someone has a NEW (that is, unused)
>camera or lens for sale, and someone tries it for two weeks, but then
>returns
>it for some subjective reason, is the item still NEW? Or is it used (mint).
>Dealers or camera stores build a profit into their sales, and, if an item is
>returned,
>can have it repackaged and sold as new (ever buy a brand new item and notice
>that it is "not quite right". . .in some way?? I have, and have asked for
>another example. . .)
>Just curious.
>sam alexander
Well, interesting points you raise there, for sure. I'd like to
know the answers too :-)
>> On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Carsten Esch wrote:
>> [gadzooks! A used 90/2 macro finally!]
>> <snip rest of list>
>>>90mm/f2.0 Macro 10 w/pouch (new in the box)
>> Curious (and maybe interested in buying), but if it's new and in
>> the box, why not return it? Will you offer something like a week or two to
>> try out the lens? Are you located in the US or no? Type of payment
>> accepted?
>> Thanks,
>> Siddiq
Carsten: would you min getting in touch via email? Thanks,
Siddiq
--
"I need perfection / some twisted selection / that tangles me / and keeps
me alive / ... "
--/Mystify/ by INXS
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|