Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

R: [OM] Zuiko 85-250 vs Canon 70-200L (surpise?)

Subject: R: [OM] Zuiko 85-250 vs Canon 70-200L (surpise?)
From: "Marco Tomat" <tom@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 1999 22:28:58 +0200
A kind of meditation, I suppose.

OM!

Marco

----------
>Da: PCACala@xxxxxxx
>A: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Oggetto: Re: [OM] Zuiko 85-250 vs Canon 70-200L (surpise?)
>Data: Mar, 13 apr 1999 16:58
>

> is there are many settings that match primes, like: 85, 90, 100, 135, 180,
> 200, 250.  It isn't so much the expense that limits my efforts, it sitting
> lotus style staring at the same fine detail from frame to frame and
> attempting to make SQF determinations.  Seven settings for one zoom is a
> burnout.  If I have to do seven at a sitting, I'd rather be doing more
> lenses.  Then there are other odd focal lengths, like 40, Leica's 75, 20
> (various manufacturers), Contax's 25, etc.

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • R: [OM] Zuiko 85-250 vs Canon 70-200L (surpise?), Marco Tomat <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz