For the 85-250 Zuiko, I have my 85 and 135mm length results posted at:
http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm
It's interesting to compare this to the 65-200mm f/4 Zuiko, which at the
short and medium lengths is insignificantly different.
I also posted the results of the following:
* Hoya 75-260mm f/4.5 (check out the center at 135mm at f/8, it's an A+.
Gary Schloss said this was a sleeper. Rebranded as a Soligor. Sold with a
tripod collar. But look at the vignetting - ouch!)
* Canon FD 300mm f/5.6 SSC (the A's here tell me that the 350mm f/2.8 Zuiko
is probably going to require a grade higher than an A+, since I did some side
by side comparisons between these last year)
* Canon FD 28-55mm f/3.5~4.5 (smaller than the 28-48 S Zuiko and as petite as
the 35-70 f/3.5~4.5 S Zuiko)
I forget to shoot the 180mm f/2.8 Zuiko, but will have that soon, as well as
missing data from above.
As Greg told us, who said that today's lenses are that much better? The
manufacturer's? . . .
Gary Reese
Las Vegas, NV
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|